Errors reveal characteristics of the languages we use and the technologies we use to communicate them — everything from scripts and letter forms (which while very fundamental to written communication are technologies nonetheless) to the computer software we use to create and communicate text.
I’ve spent the last few weeks in Japan. In the process, I’ve learned a bit about the Japanese language; no small part of this through errors. Here’s one error that taught me quite a lot. The sentence is shown in Japanese and then followed by a translation into English:
This year, a clam started living in my stomach.
Needless to say perhaps, this was an error. It was supposed to say:
This year, I started living abroad.
When the sentences are translated into romaji (i.e., Japanese written in an Roman script) the similarity becomes much more clear to readers that don’t understand Japanese:
Kotoshikara kaiga ini sumihajimemashita.
Kotoshikara kaigaini sumihajimemashita.
Kotoshikara means “since this year.” Sumihajimemashita means, “has started living.” The word kaigaini means “abroad” or “overseas.” Kaiga ini (two words) means “clam in stomach.” When written phonetically in romaji, the only difference in the two sentences lie in the introduction of a word-break in the middle of “kaigaini.” Written out in Japanese, the sentences are quite different; even without understanding, one can see that more than a few of the characters in the sentences differ.
In English word spacing plays an essential role in making written language understandable. Japanese, however, is normally written without spaces between words.
This isn’t a problem in Japanese because the Japanese script uses a combination of logograms — called kanji — and phonetic characters — called hiragana and katakana or simply kana — to delimit words and to describe structure. The result, to Japanese readers, is unambiguous. Phonetically and without spaces, the two sentences are identical in either kana or romaji:
In purely phonetic form, the sentence is ambiguous. Using kanji, as shown in the opening examples, this ambiguity is removed. While phonetically identical, “kaigaini” (abroad) and “kaiga ini” (clam in stomach) are very different when kanji is used; they are written “海外に” and “貝が胃に” respectively and are not easily confusable by Japanese readers.
This error, and many others like it, stems from the way that Japanese text is input into computers. Because there are more than 4,000 kanji in frequent use in Japan, there simply are not enough keys on a keyboard to input kanji directly. Instead, text in Japanese is input into computers phonetically (i.e., in kana) without spaces or explicit word boundaries. Once the kana is input, users then transform the phonetic representation of their sentence or phrase into a version using the appropriate kanji logograms. To do so, Japanese computer users employ special software that contains a database of mappings of kana to kanji. In the process, this software makes educated guesses about where word boundaries are. Usually, computers guess correctly. When computers get it wrong, users need to go back and tweak the conversion by hand or select from other options in a list. Sometimes, when users are in a rush, they use an incorrect kana to kanji conversion. It would be obvious to any Japanese computer users that this is precisely what happened in the sentence above.
This type of error has few parallels in English but is extremely common in Japanese writing. The effects, like this one, are often confusing or hilarious. For a Japanese reader, this error reveals the kana to kanji mapping system and the computer software that implements it — nobody would make such a mistake with a pen and paper. For a person less familiar with Japanese, the error reveals a number of technical particularities about the Japanese writing system and, in the process, about the ways in Japanese differs from other languages they might speak.
8 Replies to “Creating Kanji”
Wow, this is by far the best entry yet. Fantastic.
a most excellent error. I teach about this, when I teach in a class called “abracadabra.” It turns out that the issue of spacing plagues indo-euro languages as well…
Thanks for the link Chris. I actually removed a sentence from an earlier draft of this article that said something along the lines of “English and other languages have major problems when spaces are (or were) removed.” I removed it because I couldn’t find a link that I thought sufficiently and concisely showed the issues involved.
Thanks so much for you link. I think it tells an important part of the story!
Noah, I’m thrilled you like the entry. I have another entry or two I’ll posting about Japanese in the near future, I think.
I type romaji and convert them into kanji-hiragana sentence.
There are several dictionaries to do that.
The best result would be given by the software named ATOK.
In Linux, there is no ATOK in default.
It is not free.
Of course we have open-source ones, but week in conversion.
Absolutely great infomation thank you so much for sharing
this error is nowhere to be seen.
this error is now here to be seen.
The thing that makes this error even more interesting is that in most cases, these kanji libraries are adaptive. That is to say, the more one types with a given computer, the more accurately it learns to predict which characters you’re most likely to be intending to type. This phenomenon was actually used as a gag in the anime Lucky Star when one character uses another’s computer and notices the rather bizarre kanji that it suggests.
This Reminds me of the funny URL errors that people post around:
http://www.penisland.com (pen island)
http://www.childsexchange.com (child’s Exchange)